Posts RSS Comments RSS 58 Posts and 39 Comments till now

Archive for July, 2007

Laser printers a health risk?

I’m actually kind of surprised that this is news. I remember at a previous employer watching facilities get told off for hoovering out a printer that had suffered a toner spill as this would spread the carcinogenic particles throughout the office and that the clean up should actually be done with special equipment with filters (and presumably with a mask).

This said I know a lot of people with laser printers in their homes now and we were considering one ourselves, so it goes to show anything that gets coverage for something which is er technically known but not widely known is worth knowing.

You know a blog post has gone south when you start to sound like Donald Rumsfeld… :(

Nominet Registrar Information Day

I was lucky enough a week or two back to get a day away from the screen up in London to attend Nominet’s registrar information day. The event had a sensible start time of 9.30 for registration (presentations starting at 10.00) making travelling up the same day just about possible (i.e getting up at 5 is the very earliest I’ll entertain). I would have been there bang on time if not for a tube derailment (nothing to do with my deciding to travel I might add, gypsies curses not withstanding). Walking up a quiet Oxford street in some rare sun was really rather enjoyable.

The event itself is a strange hybrid, in some ways it would be appropriate as an Induction for new Registrars but there is also useful content in most of the segments on recent developments and a presentation on future technologies at the end and these are appropriate for anyone at a registrar who needs to keep up to date and indeed there were several attendees who had been before or were even regular to the event.

The attendees were a mixed bag or management, techies and administration staff, comprising those interested in being registrars only if they can fully automate the process to those working for small development and consultancy outfits still composing emails to register domains by hand. This made the fact that Jay Daley (whose rather scary blog on control freak techniques is well worth a read) managed to do an overview of some fairly technical subjects (DNS-Sec, Enum) before going home time without some of the less technical members of the audience beginning to foam at the mouth rather impressive.

In general the staff seemed to recognise that the organisation has an image amongst some of it’s registrars as old fashioned and bureaucratic and indeed the organisation has added a “Key Account Manager” position so that they can keep in touch with and get better feedback from the registrar community. One expects these sorts of days to be well choreographed but all of the staff I spoke to certainly gave me a more positive view of the organisation than I had had previously as well as being able to put emails addresses to faces, something which is always handy.

The staff were pretty honest, when queried on the precise rules behind a technical process involving merging account Nominet were happy to say “we’re still having fun playing with that”. Obviously it would be nice to have live systems fully documented but not being honest about why they aren’t documented yet would have been worse than confirming the details are still being set.

The concept of getting the technical team to blog along with their technical challenges as part of their objectives seems a good way to make their work more visible as well as documenting technical humps traversed (I’ve got no idea whether Nominet have an internal knowledgebase but it always surprises me how many places don’t for various reasons) and indeed publishing some of that knowledge is a pretty admirable goal for a team working at a high level. Customer facing technical teams in commercial organisations often can’t blog about recent challenges in case these reveal details about a particular incident they’d rather the customers didn’t know about for reasons of confidentiality or business prudence so it is good to see an organisation that has the opportunity take advantage of it.

Ultimately the day was worth attending and will probably be worth revisiting at a set interval or whenever there are interesting developments at the organisation that will affect the business.

WPMUDev Premium - good idea?

Recently a couple of the people who run the biggest WPMU based sites out there have put together a premium member’s area for those wishing to run serious MU based sites.

Seeing as Boz and I have been recently putting together an MU site for a group of friends this is an interesting development, I can immediately see the need for this for those working singly or in small departments who don’t have the direct WPMU expertise but want to quickly reach a large user base on a stable, scalable software base. A reasonable proportion of the freely available MU plugins out there look like they may present scaling difficulties down the line - something you definitely don’t want if you’re providing a service you have to support. Hitting a wall once you’re a few thousand users in is probably extremely unpleasant as it’s harder to redevelop something that is running 24/7.

If we do get around to building another site with WPMU (I have to say I’ve enjoyed working with it) I’ll probably subscribe to this as much out of interest as out of need.

The only real downside I can see is that they may well get an influx of subscriptions from people who really want everything done for them, from consultation to installation and ongoing support which may well clog up the premium forums and their time to support on there with inappropriate questions. However the entry fee will hopefully discourage this kind of behaviour.

There may well be a snotty counter argument to doing this sort of thing off the back of GPL style software, but in all honestly, WPMU is a fair way short of what wordpress.com is so it’s difficult to make an argument whereby these people shouldn’t get rewarded for their expertise and time. Essentially I can see dev premium saving me time in working out answers other people have already arrived at and life is too short for the alternative.

Four Pre-Requisites to working with Wordpress MU

The forums over at Wordpress MU aren’t really the hand holding sort, the regulars are just too busy. However if one has done some background work first there are good solutions in the threads and the regulars are happy to assist someone who has managed to get a part of the way on their own initiative.

A lot of people however seem to approach MU without the pre-requisite skills suggested in the software’s readme (i.e being able to cope with server level software as opposed to a single cms / wordpress install).

For this reason I’d consider the four points below fairly essential if you want to work with MU (even if you have a technical background).

1. Use self hosted wordpress for at least six months - by “use” I mean creating a site installation you’re happy with and blogging to it regularly. Install via FTP or shell rather than fantastico or equivalent and install any security updates as soon as you can.

2. Be comfortable installing and fixing small issues with widgets, plugins and themes - be comfortable reading through the code and following the logic into the database if something isn’t working as expected. The wpmu forums are an invaluable resource but will often only point you in the right direction with a code snippet, you’ll have to apply the solution or follow the logic through so it fits to your site.

3. Ideally have written some plugins / widgets / themes for WP yourself - I hadn’t before starting to work with MU and I really wish I had as there is the added complexity of considering the multi user element when working with MU.

4. Be able to manage the necessities on a dedicated server or VPSĀ  - If you need to hire hardening or optimisation experts or have the budget to pay for management, fine. My own WPMU site is currently sitting on a shared host and will hopefully be fine there - once ready to deploy a site that will be for the wider public rather than just friends from reading the MU forum it appears that this is the ONLY reliable way to go. My experience at a shared hosting company completely backs this up - as a general rule users aren’t allowed to install server level software themselves as it puts far too much of a drain on the shared resources.